Webhook vs PubSub
Webhooks and PubSub are both mechanisms for sending and receiving messages in an event-driven architecture. While they share some similarities, there are also some key differences between the two that make them well-suited for different use cases.
A webhook is a way for a web application to provide other applications with real-time information. When a specific event occurs on the web application, it sends a message to a specified URL (known as a "webhook endpoint"). The other application can then receive the message and take appropriate action, such as sending a notification or updating its own data.
Webhooks are often used in scenarios where a web application needs to send data to another application in real-time. For example, a payment processing company might use webhooks to notify a merchant's website every time a customer completes a payment. The merchant's website can then update its records and display the latest information to the customer.
PubSub, short for "Publish/Subscribe," is a messaging pattern that allows applications to communicate with each other without having to know about each other's existence. In a PubSub system, publishers send messages to a topic, and subscribers receive messages from that topic. The PubSub system acts as a broker, routing messages from publishers to subscribers without the two needing to be directly connected.
PubSub is often used in scenarios where multiple applications need to receive and process messages, but the publisher and subscribers are not known to each other. For example, a news website might use PubSub to send updates to multiple third-party applications, such as a weather app, a stock market app, and a sports app. Each of these applications can subscribe to the news website's topic and receive the updates in real-time.
One key difference between webhooks and PubSub is the level of control they provide over the message delivery. With webhooks, the publisher has complete control over who receives the message and when it is delivered. The publisher specifies the webhook endpoint, and the message is delivered directly to that endpoint. In contrast, with PubSub, the publisher has no control over who receives the message. The message is delivered to all subscribers of the topic, regardless of whether the publisher knows about them or not.
Given this difference in control, PubSub may be more suitable for use in an internal system where the messages are being sent and handled globally and the listeners are trusted. In this case, the lack of control over who receives the message may not be an issue, as the listeners are part of the same system and can be trusted to handle the message appropriately.
On the other hand, webhooks may be more suitable for use in external-facing applications, where it is important to have more control over who receives the message and when it is delivered. This could be important, for example, if the publisher is sending sensitive data and wants to ensure that it is only delivered to a specific endpoint. Additionally, webhooks may be preferred if the publisher wants to have more control over the timing of the message delivery, as they can specify when the message is sent to the webhook endpoint.
In summary, webhooks and PubSub are both useful mechanisms for sending and receiving messages in an event-driven architecture. Webhooks are well-suited for scenarios where a web application needs to send data to another application in real-time, while PubSub is better for scenarios where multiple applications need to receive and process messages from a publisher. The key differences between the two include the level of control over message delivery and whether they should be used to communicate between internal tools or with external sources.