Skip to main content


MQTT (Message Queuing Telemetry Transport)

  • Protocol Type: Publish-subscribe-based messaging protocol.
  • Use Case: Ideal for IoT applications, requiring minimal network bandwidth and device resources.
  • Architecture: Central broker-based architecture.

CoAP (Constrained Application Protocol)

  • Protocol Type: Web transfer protocol.
  • Use Case: Designed for simple, constrained devices and low-power, lossy networks.
  • Architecture: Client-server model, similar to HTTP but optimized for M2M (machine-to-machine) applications.
FeatureMQTT (Message Queuing Telemetry Transport)CoAP (Constrained Application Protocol)
Protocol TypePublish/SubscribeRequest/Response (similar to HTTP)
Transport LayerTCPUDP
Payload FormatBinary, minimal restrictionsSimilar to HTTP, often uses CBOR or XML
Quality of Service3 levels (0, 1, 2)Natively supports confirmable messages
OverheadRelatively higher due to TCPLower, designed for constrained envs
Session StateMaintains stateful sessionsStateless (similar to HTTP)
InteroperabilityHigh with many IoT platformsOptimized for M2M, less widely adopted
Use CasesHome automation, Industrial IoTSmart cities, Resource-constrained IoT

Key Similarities

  1. IoT Focus: Both are designed for IoT applications, emphasizing efficiency and lightweight implementation.
  2. Constrained Environments: Suitable for constrained devices and networks.
  3. Asynchronous Communication: Support asynchronous interaction patterns.

Key Differences

  1. Protocol Type: MQTT is a publish/subscribe model, ideal for scenarios where multiple clients are interested in updates from a server. CoAP is request/response, similar to RESTful APIs.
  2. Transport Layer: MQTT uses TCP which is connection-oriented, reliable but with higher overhead. CoAP uses UDP, which is connectionless and more suitable for constrained networks.
  3. Security: MQTT relies on TLS/SSL for security, while CoAP uses Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS).
  4. Payload and Overhead: MQTT is flexible with payload but creates higher overhead due to TCP. CoAP is designed for efficiency in constrained environments, often using compact formats like CBOR.
  5. Interoperability and Use Cases: MQTT has broader adoption in general IoT platforms. CoAP is more specialized for machine-to-machine (M2M) communication and environments like smart cities or constrained IoT devices.

Use Cases


  • Ideal for scenarios requiring high reliability and where bandwidth is not severely limited.
  • Common in home automation, telemetry, and scenarios with a central data aggregation point.


  • Suited for real-time, M2M applications in extremely constrained environments.
  • Common in smart city applications, environmental monitoring, and energy management.
Svix is the enterprise ready webhooks sending service. With Svix, you can build a secure, reliable, and scalable webhook platform in minutes. Looking to send webhooks? Give it a try!


  • Choose MQTT for robust, scalable applications requiring high reliability and where network constraints are less of an issue.
  • Opt for CoAP in environments with limited resources, where efficiency and lower overhead are crucial, and for systems that closely resemble RESTful web services.